Pushing the Boundaries Together
by David Park and Dan Ra
Editor’s note: This article was originally attributed solely to David Park. It was actually a collaborative effort between David and Dan Ra. The article has been updated to reflect this.
David: The joke goes something like this: when a Japanese person goes to a new city, he looks to start a business; when a Chinese person first arrives in a new place, he looks to start a restaurant; but when a Korean comes to town, he’s going to start a church. As my Korean immigrant father is a recently retired pastor who planted or shepherded at least seven churches that I can count, I can attest to the above punchline—Koreans love church. And we’ve taken to church planting and the Christian industry by storm, a sort of ecclesiological Kim Yunah phenomenon for those of you who watched the Winter Olympics. We’re the darlings of global missiological and church talk: we plant big-ass churches and carve them out of the mountainsides; we send more missionaries than any other country; we boast some of the fastest growing and multiplying churches stateside as well, but if Dan Ra’s and my experiences are any indication, the gig is just about up. Korean Americans and their churches need to slow down and take a good look in the mirror because despite Soong Chan Rah’s claim that ethnic minorities are leading the next evangelicalism in the 21st century, the descent could be pretty steep.
Dan: In 2007, I found what was then called “the emergent conversation”, I was bright-eyed, curious, disillusioned and confused. Three years later, I find myself in “the emergent i-don’t-know-anymore” but nothing about me has changed. I am still filled with wonder and God and God’s kingdom are as beautiful as ever. However, the conversation has changed, and some would even say, died. And we’ve read commentaries from christian blogs such things as “emergent sold out because it’s not exclusive and cool anymore” or “emergent has become so diverse and varied it’s just changed.” Recently Emergent has made clear efforts to diversify its identity. With events like C21 and the recognition that the two-thirds world is now the “superpower” in global Christianity, things seemed hopeful.
But frankly, most of those voices come from our white friends. So what then say the asian american emergents among us? Even then there are scant and varying opinions. So you’ll have my perspective, and I’ll try to keep references to Soong-Chan Rah at a minimum.
While Asian American Christians are largely conservatively evangelical, the truth is, most of us lack self-awareness about our beliefs. Indeed most of us would find theological angst and exploration absurd and unnecessary. This is one of the toughest problems regarding the relationship (or lack of) between the Asian American church and emergent. Put simply, most Asian Americans, like most Americans if we were to be honest, don’t care about the unraveling of certain “major” theological notions. They won’t be engaging with the emergent church, at least for a while. This, admittedly so, is a glaring problem with the Asian American church: theological apathy.
That said, the emergent church will need to make greater and more intentional efforts to reach out to the Asian American church. Although I was pleased to see that all of C21’s speakers were women, I was disheartened to see only one was a minority. Unfortunately, widening the doors to new emergent gatherings won’t be good enough. What I’m asking is for the emergent church to take steps towards non-white communities and do two things: listen and see. As of right now, it appears to me that the emergent church acts as though western Christianity is still the ultimate beast, although knowing that Latin American, African, and Asian churches are creating great ripples. But even in America today, the rise in the minority population is greatly affecting the racial demographic of those that are practicing the Christian faith. If the emergent church had something to say about the confines and failings of modernism and individualism, will we have something to say about the changing face of American Christianity? Will we actively engage and invite racially alternative voices, even from the academic sphere? Will we step into Korean Presbyterian, Ethiopian Orthodox, Latin Pentecostal, and black American baptist churches and see how young, hyphenated American parishioners are experiencing the faith?
So what does this look like in practice? How can non-minority emergent christians break the separatist nature of ethnic minority christian communities in the U.S. and ask, “Hey, can we talk?” Because, at least in the Asian American church, the deconstructive and, in turn, redeeming spirit of the emergent conversation is desperately needed. Because we know how to plant churches, and we know how to get all the answers right, but we’ve forgotten how to ask questions. We are simply copying your means of empire, whether it be figure skating champs, automobiles or churches. And we may “do” church better for now, but that’s just postcolonial inertia. Emergent needs to engage ethnic churches because it is the next step to pushing the boundaries further together.
David Park and Dan Ra write with other Asian American bloggers at Next Gener.Asian Church. David is finishing up a degree at Columbia Theological Seminary in Decatur, GA and likes the fact that he has no idea as to what comes next. When Dan Ra isn’t writing for Next Gener.Asian Church, he is dabbling with computers, singing for communities, and dreaming of possibilities for Asian American Christians in our post-everything world.
Bookmark this article using Remarkable!
Welcome to the Reader's Forum
David,
Wow! Just wow! I am relatively new to the conversation. When I first started exploring Jesus it was in a black baptist church in Chicago with some African American neighbors. I was pretty much the only white person there and my first steps were wondrous. Things started going downhill when I started attending a mostly white church in the ‘burbs.
The experience is different and there is a lot that can be added to the DNA of the conversation if we have more cultures and backgrounds to enrich us all.
Well written.
Great to hear this Dan, I think I recently met you briefly in Atlanta…I’ll give my two cents observation to go alongside your wonderful post. I think one very operative dynamic that kind of affects the relationship of the North American/Emergent Village/emerging church/mostly-white-guys-and-a-few-cool-white-women community toward others, and in this case the Asian American Christian community that you speak of, is the issue of, “Is it growing, does it have energy”?
In other words, as long as Asia-Amer-ianity is an exciting growth industry there will be no motivation on their part to bother paying attention to some non-relevant white evangelical sub-movement such as the emerging church. This is true of anything that is growing and full of energy.
There are a lot of reasons why the emerging church “emerged”, but one powerful one has been the decline of White North American Christianity, beginning to look alarmingly like White European Christianity when it first began to decline. This is why you have seen the amazing coming together of evangelicals and mainliners in this movement – because we’re both declining and we’re both trying to figure out why. (of course there’s much more to it than that, but this is simply one powerful motivator).
So, of course we hope no one’s deal will decline, but there are signs of generational change between the Asian American parents that pioneered a new community in America and built those churches and structures, and the younger generations that have grown up here. I know of a great community of faith in Queens, NYC called Queens West that is basically a “Not Your Father’s Church” for Asian Americans, mostly Korean, who are younger generation Christians who don’t feel comfortable in their parents style of church – similar to what a lot of emergents experience.
On the other hand, Asian American familial ties and cultural forms of expression may slow their willingness to “break” with their parents way of church (which may be a very good thing).
The white emerging church itself is affected by this same dynamic – maybe Evangelicalism is still going well enough so that there isn’t enough motivation to “emerge” to something else. (Sadly not an issue in the Mainline where it’s been in decline a lot longer and steeper) I think it depends a lot on where you live (how vibrant your local church community options are) and a lot of socio-economic-education-personality issues (how vibrant those communities expressions are perceived by you).
Who knows where it will all go? But I do know I’d love to walk alongside anyone deconstructing their stuff, because they think their stuff is static and not growing, ‘cause I know mine is static and not growing and maybe we’ll figure some stuff out. Jeff
Add Emergent Village to
Join our mailing list:



David thanks so much for the article/blogg. I co-hub Converse one of the key emerging church networks in Sydney Australia. I also look after a 1.5/2nd Generation Korean Australian EM that is becoming a separate Congregation. I planted the EM Ministry and looked after it for 12 years – seeing it through 3 “generations” of University and early workers. It took 3 generations before it took hold and was embedded. In that time we had 3 major splits and 3 Senior Ministers/ Muk Sunims. I left for 5 years and am back as a Consultant/ Executive type pastor with my wife to help with the transition to a new pastor and the codependant formation of the new congregation. It has taken 19 years. I do not use the terms “Emergening Church” though I mention it occasionally to blank and questioning looks. The Mother Church is called Cheil and for those of you who know something of Korean Language and culture – I am suggesting the new church be called “Second best church” – it gets some good laughs from those in the know. I totally agree with you in regards to the difficulties of engaging Migrant Ethnic Communities into the Emergent Conversation. It is a different cosmology, culture, ecclesiology even missiology. Koreans live in the “bubble” of the church – the church is also their cultural centre. Unlike some other migrating cultures they ahve different cultural centres to the church. Yet what we have grown amongst the “3rd generation” is a Korean Australian theology which includes a lot of the Emergent thinking yet in another langusage – even thoguht the first language amongst most members is English. We battle continuously with the pressure to “revert back” to the Korean-Korean culture and their attitudes but the struggle is a key one. The important dimensions on this thinking have come from blending together Korean and Australian language (Konglish) a Korean-Australian Food style (inductive contextualisation) A voice for young people (20-40 year olds) and “space” to be honest and reflect on the task of integrity of the Korean Culture, The Australian Culture (very Multi-ciltural) and the scriptural tradition.
After 19 years the journey has just begun. I am anglo-Australian as is my wife – both of us International Church consultants – and we have found that combination a very helpful one to be “in the Korean Culture – but not of it”. It’s been an amazing experience and has helped me so much in broadening the Emerging Church Conversation.